Chiswick Licensing Dispute Highlights Tensions Over New Restaurant Proposal

A recent licensing application for a new restaurant and bar in Chiswick has sparked controversy, with local councillor Joanna Biddolph accused of unfairly criticising the applicant, Shahid Hirji. The matter was brought before the LB Hounslow's Licensing Panel on Wednesday, 17 July, where the allegations of a deliberate attempt to tarnish Hirji's reputation were discussed.

Shahid Hirji, a local businessman, has submitted an application for an alcohol licence for his new establishment, which combines two existing business premises on Chiswick High Road into a single, larger venue. The premises, located at 299-303 Chiswick High Road, are being transformed into a spacious restaurant with a bar area in the basement. The application has been met with resistance from Councillor Joanna Biddolph, who has raised concerns about the nature of the business and its potential impact on the community.

During the licensing panel meeting, Stewart Gibson, representing Hirji, accused Councillor Biddolph of attempting to "smear" Hirji by making unfounded insinuations about his character and intentions.

Gibson argued that Biddolph's objections were based on misinformation and portrayed Hirji as "an unfit person" without any substantial evidence. Despite these serious allegations, Councillor Biddolph was not present at the meeting to defend her position, having submitted her objections in writing beforehand. The only other objection came from a member of the public, who also did not attend the meeting.

The panel, chaired by Councillor Gabriella Giles, who also represents Chiswick on Hounslow Council, urged Gibson to maintain civility during the proceedings. Following this admonishment, Gibson retracted his comments. The panel confirmed that Hirji's application had been properly submitted and that all necessary procedures had been followed. Furthermore, no objections were raised by the police or licensing enforcement authorities.

The premises in question have a long history, with Hirji's family owning the properties for several decades. The first property, number 303, was purchased by Hirji's father in 1986, followed by number 301 approximately 25-30 years ago, and finally number 299 five years ago. The family has primarily acted as landlords, leasing the properties to various businesses, including a car spares shop, a flower shop, an Indian restaurant, and a takeaway pizza place. Both the Indian restaurant and the pizza place previously held alcohol licences, and Hirji's current application does not seek any additional privileges beyond those previously granted.

Councillor Biddolph's objections centred around concerns that the new venue might operate as a nightclub, potentially leading to antisocial behaviour and crime. She referenced a previous panel hearing from 14 years ago, where Hirji was denied a licence for an entertainment business. However, Gibson clarified that the new establishment is intended to be a restaurant and bar, not a nightclub. The application specifies that the ground floor will serve as a restaurant, while the basement will host live entertainment, private functions, and overflow from the restaurant during busy periods. The proposed alcohol licence would allow sales from 9 am to 12:30 am Monday to Thursday and Sundays, and from 9 am to 1 am on Fridays and Saturdays, which Gibson argued is not indicative of nightclub hours.

Hirji has also addressed planning and regulatory concerns, stating that he applied for planning permission weeks ago and has complied with all building regulations. He has installed soundproofing in the basement that exceeds the required standards and added an extra fire exit for safety. The Hounslow planning department is currently reviewing his application, and Councillor Richard Foote emphasised that planning issues were not within the scope of the licensing meeting.

The dispute highlights ongoing tensions between local businesses and community representatives in Chiswick. Councillor Biddolph has a history of opposing local business initiatives, including a recent event by the West London Queer Project (WLQP) to host a street party. Her objections often focus on concerns about community impact and adherence to regulations, but critics argue that her approach can be overly restrictive and detrimental to local economic development.

The outcome of Hirji's application remains pending, with the licensing panel expected to make a decision in the coming weeks. The case underscores the complexities of balancing business interests with community concerns in urban areas like Chiswick. As the area continues to evolve, the need for constructive dialogue and collaboration between stakeholders becomes increasingly important.

The broader implications of this case extend beyond the immediate parties involved. It raises questions about the role of local government in regulating business activities and the potential for personal biases to influence decision-making processes. The situation also highlights the importance of transparency and accountability in public office, as well as the need for fair and equitable treatment of all community members.